TÜRKIYE'S GAME | WHAT IS ERDOĞAN'S BIG STRATEGY

Global Affairs Session 58 24 June 2026

TÜRKİYE'S GAME

Erdoğan's high-wire act between East and West

Türkiye under Erdoğan has moved from Atatürk's secular, Western-facing republic toward a strong presidential regime that mixes nationalism, Islamic symbolism and strategic autonomy. It stays inside NATO while bargaining with the West, balancing Russia and China, projecting power across the Middle East, and competing for leadership of the Islamic world — a high-wire act that will shape its future as a powerful but troublesome ally.

Global Affairs Session 58: Türkiye's Game — Erdoğan's high-wire act

A quick history

Türkiye grew out of the Ottoman Empire, once a vast Muslim imperial power across Europe, Asia and Africa. After the Ottoman defeat in World War I, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk founded the secular Turkish Republic in 1923.

For decades, Türkiye balanced nationalism, secularism, army influence and Western alignment. Since 2002, Erdoğan has reshaped Türkiye toward strong presidential rule, Islamic-nationalist politics, strategic autonomy, regional activism and a more assertive global identity.

Timeline from the Ottoman Empire to the modern Erdoğan era
Türkiye's geography as a bridge between Europe, Asia and the Middle East

Nature of Türkiye's Erdoğan regime

Erdoğan's Türkiye is an electoral but increasingly authoritarian presidential regime.

  • Power is highly centralised around Erdoğan and the ruling AKP.
  • Institutions face pressure: the media, courts, bureaucracy and security institutions face strong political pressure.
  • An ideological blend: the regime combines Turkish nationalism, Sunni Islamic symbolism and conservative social values.
  • An unequal contest: elections continue, but opposition parties compete on an unequal playing field.
How power is centralised and structured inside Erdoğan's regime

Relationship of Türkiye with the West

Türkiye remains a NATO member and is still strategically vital to the West.

  • Real tensions persist: its relations with the US and EU are tense over democracy, Kurds, Syria, Russia and defense policy.
  • Ankara wants Western benefits: it seeks Western trade, technology, investment and security benefits.
  • Yet it resists lecturing: at the same time, it rejects Western lectures and seeks independent room for action.
  • A bargaining, semi-aligned ally: Türkiye is not anti-Western in a simple sense; it is a difficult, bargaining, semi-aligned ally.
Türkiye and the West: a complicated NATO partnership

Relationship of Türkiye with Russia and China

Türkiye cooperates with Russia on energy, trade, tourism, Syria and diplomacy.

  • But it also competes: Türkiye competes with Russia in Ukraine, the Black Sea, the Caucasus and Central Asia.
  • China matters economically: China matters to Türkiye for trade, investment, infrastructure and Eurasian connectivity.
  • A hedge against the West: Ankara uses Russia and China to reduce dependence on the West.
  • Balance, not subordination: Türkiye wants balance, not subordination to Moscow or Beijing.
Türkiye balancing cooperation and competition with Russia and China

Role of Türkiye in the Middle East and MENA

Türkiye wants to be a major regional power and not merely a NATO frontier state.

  • Direct intervention: it has intervened in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Qatar and the Eastern Mediterranean.
  • A wide toolkit: it uses drones, defense exports, intelligence, trade, religion, aid and media influence.
  • A core security goal: preventing Kurdish separatism is one of its core regional security goals.
  • Ideology mixed with pragmatism: Türkiye now mixes ideology with pragmatism, seeking influence without total isolation.
Türkiye's regional playbook across Syria, Libya, Qatar and the Eastern Mediterranean

Türkiye's stance on Israel

Türkiye recognises Israel but has extremely hostile political relations with it.

  • Sharp public criticism: Erdoğan strongly criticises Israel over Gaza, Palestine, Lebanon and Iran.
  • A self-cast defender role: Türkiye presents itself as a defender of Palestinians and Muslim causes.
  • A swinging relationship: relations have moved between normalisation and sharp breakdown.
  • A leadership tool: anti-Israel rhetoric also strengthens Erdoğan's leadership claims in the Islamic world.
Türkiye and Israel: formal recognition without warmth

Türkiye's role during the Iran War 2026

Türkiye condemned the US-Israeli attacks on Iran and warned against a wider regional war.

  • Stayed out militarily: Ankara avoided direct military involvement and protected its own security interests.
  • Backed de-escalation: Türkiye supported ceasefire, diplomacy and de-escalation.
  • Its value rose: the war increased Türkiye's value as a NATO member, Iranian neighbour and regional broker.
  • A dual message: Erdoğan used the crisis to criticise Israel while keeping Türkiye out of open war.

What Türkiye wants in the Islamic world

Türkiye wants prestige as a strong, modern, independent Muslim power.

  • Moral leadership claims: it seeks moral leadership on Palestine and selected Muslim causes.
  • A wide sphere of influence: it wants influence in Syria, Qatar, Central Asia, the Balkans and Africa.
  • Crowded competition: it competes with Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt and the UAE for leadership space.
  • Influence, not empire: it invokes Ottoman memory, but its goal is influence, not formal empire.
Türkiye's ambitions, sphere of influence and rivals across the Islamic world

Future of Türkiye

Türkiye will likely remain a powerful but troublesome NATO ally.

  • Depends on four factors: its future depends on the economy, opposition strength, institutions and Erdoğan's succession.
  • A settled foreign-policy style: its foreign policy will remain multi-aligned, transactional and nationalist.
  • Growing military reach: its drone and defense industries will increase its military influence.
  • A five-way balancing act: its central challenge is balancing democracy, Islam, nationalism, economic stability and great-power politics.
Best-case, muddle-through and risk scenarios for Türkiye through 2030
Value addition

Glossary and related terms

AKP
The Justice and Development Party, Erdoğan's ruling party, blending conservative, nationalist and Islamist politics.
Kemalism
The secular, nationalist and modernising ideology founded by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk that shaped the early Turkish Republic.
Electoral authoritarianism
A political system that holds regular elections while curbing genuine competition through control of media, courts and institutions.
Strategic autonomy
A state's pursuit of independent decision-making in foreign and security policy rather than full alignment with any single bloc.
Multi-alignment
A foreign-policy approach that maintains simultaneous, transactional relationships with rival powers instead of committing to one camp.
Semi-aligned ally
A partner that stays formally within an alliance while regularly pursuing independent or divergent interests.
NATO frontier state
A member state whose geography places it directly along the alliance's external security perimeter.
Kurdish separatism
Political and armed movements seeking greater autonomy or independence for Kurdish populations, a core security concern for Ankara.
Eastern Mediterranean dispute
Overlapping claims among Türkiye, Greece, Cyprus and others over maritime boundaries and offshore gas exploration rights.
Drone diplomacy
The use of exported combat drones and defense technology as tools of influence and alliance-building.
Regional broker
A state that positions itself as a mediator or intermediary between conflicting parties in its neighbourhood.
Transactional foreign policy
An approach that evaluates relationships primarily by immediate, concrete gains rather than ideological consistency.
Ottoman legacy
The historical memory of Ottoman imperial rule, invoked today for cultural and political influence rather than territorial restoration.
Sunni Islamic symbolism
The use of religious identity and imagery to build domestic legitimacy and regional leadership claims.
Value addition

Conceptual references

  • Comparative literature on electoral authoritarianism and democratic backsliding.
  • NATO alliance-cohesion debates involving frontier and semi-aligned members.
  • Analyses of multi-alignment and transactional diplomacy among middle powers.
  • Eastern Mediterranean maritime-boundary and energy-exploration disputes.
  • Studies on Ottoman historical memory as a tool of contemporary regional influence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICA VERSUS ALLIES

DEADLY PHASE 2026-30.

CHINA PREPARING FOR WAR?