WHY UAE LEFT OPEC

Global Affairs Session 26 30 April 2026

WHY UAE LEFT OPEC

Oil nationalism, Saudi rivalry and the struggle for market share

This session examines the oil-market logic behind the UAE’s break with OPEC: an economy with low production costs and diversified revenues seeks greater sales volume and market share, while Saudi Arabia requires higher prices and stricter production cuts. The dispute extends into Gulf leadership, OPEC+ relations with Russia, American strategy, Asian demand and the growing need to finance hydrogen, ammonia and renewable-energy ambitions.

Global Affairs Session 26: Why UAE Left OPEC

The UAE’s decisive regional role

The presentation opens by placing the UAE’s oil choices inside a wider regional-security argument. It highlights the Strait of Hormuz, the scale of Iranian pressure and the UAE’s determination that the waterway should not be held hostage by any country.

“We must also say that this event is pivotal because we have never witnessed... an Iranian attack of this scale, scope and ferocity. The Strait of Hormuz cannot be held hostage by any country. Yes, Iran lost, and yes, the UAE won.”

Dr Anwar Gargash, Diplomatic Advisor to the UAE President

The UAE’s seven-emirate geography also matters. Abu Dhabi provides the principal hydrocarbon base, Dubai anchors commerce and services, and Fujairah gives the federation a strategic position on the Gulf of Oman beyond the Strait of Hormuz.

Dr Anwar Gargash on the UAE’s decisive regional role and the Strait of Hormuz
Map of the seven emirates and key locations across the United Arab Emirates

Global oil and gas

Oil and gas remain central to the world economy even as climate policy, renewable energy and new technologies reshape investment decisions.

  • Energy dominance: Oil and gas together still account for approximately 50–55 per cent of global energy consumption, keeping them central despite the growth of renewables.
  • Role of alliances: OPEC produces approximately 35–40 per cent of global oil and holds roughly 70–80 per cent of reserves, while OPEC+ influences more than half of supply.
  • Production concentration: A few countries dominate output—the United States with approximately 20 per cent of oil and 25 per cent of gas, Saudi Arabia with approximately 12–13 per cent of oil, and Russia with approximately 10–11 per cent of oil and 17 per cent of gas.
  • Transition pressure: Climate policies and renewables are changing investment patterns, but medium-term demand remains strong because of industrial and transport requirements.
Global oil and gas: energy dominance, alliances, production concentration and transition pressure

The birth of OPEC

  • Formation of OPEC in 1960: Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela founded OPEC in Baghdad to coordinate oil policies and gain greater control over pricing from Western companies.
  • Rise in global influence during the 1970s: OPEC gained power during the 1973 oil embargo, when production cuts sharply increased global oil prices and demonstrated the organisation’s geopolitical influence.
  • Market challenges from the 1980s to the 2010s: Internal disagreements, non-OPEC production such as United States shale and repeated price volatility weakened unified control over the oil market.
  • Creation of OPEC+ in 2016: OPEC formed an alliance with non-members, notably Russia, to stabilise markets through coordinated production cuts and expand its global influence.
Timeline showing the formation, expansion and evolution of OPEC and OPEC+

The politics of OPEC

  • Production quotas and the power balance: Members negotiate output limits while balancing price stability against national interests. Countries such as Saudi Arabia exercise especially strong influence.
  • Geopolitical tensions: Rivalries, including tensions between Iran and Gulf states, and wider regional conflicts shape decisions inside OPEC.
  • OPEC+ alliances: Cooperation with non-members such as Russia extends the group’s influence but introduces additional political complexity.
  • Market-versus-politics trade-off: Decisions reflect not only economics but also diplomacy, sanctions and pressure from major consuming countries.
How production quotas, geopolitics, OPEC+ alliances and market politics shape OPEC decisions

The costs matter

Saudi Arabia needs high oil prices—above approximately $80 per barrel in the presentation’s framing—to fund its Vision 2030 projects. This encourages Riyadh to defend production cuts through OPEC and prioritise price stability.

The UAE has a more diversified economy and some of the world’s lowest production costs. It therefore has a stronger incentive to increase sales volume, accept a modestly lower price and secure a larger long-term share of the market.

The cost angle: Saudi price requirements compared with the UAE’s low-cost volume strategy

Saudi Arabia versus the UAE

  • Quota disputes: Saudi Arabia pushes for stricter production discipline, while the UAE has argued for higher quotas that reflect its expanded production capacity.
  • Baseline disagreement in 2021: The UAE challenged OPEC+ rules by demanding a higher baseline for calculating cuts, briefly creating tension in negotiations.
  • Different market strategies: Saudi Arabia often prioritises price stability, including through deep cuts, whereas the UAE favours higher output to maximise long-term market share.
  • Regional rivalry and alignment: Despite close political ties, the two states compete for influence in energy policy and regional leadership.
Saudi Arabia versus the UAE in OPEC: production priorities and strategic differences
MBS versus MBZ: contrasting Saudi and Emirati leadership, economic and regional strategies

Saudis, Emiratis and Russians

The presentation describes withdrawal from OPEC as an announcement of the end of economic dependence on Riyadh’s policies and the adoption of a more assertive nationalism that places UAE interests above Gulf solidarity.

It argues that the Gulf Cooperation Council’s institutional weaknesses make collective decisions heavily dependent on personal relations between leaders. Growing differences over Iran and Yemen could therefore divide the Council into competing blocs.

An Emirati withdrawal would also weaken OPEC+. The presentation portrays the UAE as a safety valve that helped balance Russia’s “indiscipline” when Moscow produced above quota to finance its war effort in Ukraine.

Without the UAE, Saudi Arabia could find itself more isolated in confronting Russia and might eventually use a destructive price war to restore discipline, as occurred in 2020.

How a UAE withdrawal could affect Saudi Arabia, Russia, the Gulf Cooperation Council and OPEC+

OPEC, America and the UAE’s game

  • America sees OPEC as a cartel that serves Russian interests and harms the American consumer.
  • The presentation describes the UAE’s withdrawal as a major victory for American foreign policy because it damages Arab–Russian oil unity.
  • Global demand is moving towards Asia, particularly China and India, and the UAE seeks direct supply agreements with these markets.
  • The UAE wants to become a global hub for hydrogen, ammonia and renewable energy.
  • These ambitions require immediate and massive financial liquidity, making freedom to expand oil sales central to the UAE’s strategy.
OPEC, America and the UAE’s strategy across consumers, Russia, Asia and clean-energy investment

What about oil crude benchmarks?

  • Brent: The most widely used global pricing reference. It is associated with North Sea offshore fields between the United Kingdom and Norway and is a light, sweet crude at approximately 38° API with roughly 0.3–0.4 per cent sulphur.
  • WTI: The dominant North American benchmark with major global influence. It is traded through the Cushing, Oklahoma hub and is a very light, very sweet crude at approximately 39–40° API with roughly 0.2–0.3 per cent sulphur.
  • Murban: An emerging Asia-focused benchmark from Abu Dhabi. It is a light, sweet crude at approximately 40° API with roughly 0.7–0.8 per cent sulphur and is growing in importance while remaining less influential globally than Brent or WTI.
Comparison of Brent, WTI and Murban crude-oil benchmarks
Value addition

Glossary and related terms

OPEC
Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, a group through which member states coordinate petroleum policies and production decisions.
OPEC+
The wider cooperation framework linking OPEC members with non-member producers such as Russia.
Production quota
An agreed limit on the amount of oil a member is expected to produce during a specified period.
Production baseline
The reference production level from which a member’s required cut or increase is calculated.
Market share
The proportion of total market sales supplied by a particular producer or country.
Price stability
An approach that seeks to prevent excessively sharp rises or falls in oil prices.
Price war
A strategy in which producers raise supply or reduce prices aggressively to pressure competitors and regain discipline or market share.
Oil benchmark
A reference crude whose price and quality are used to value other grades of oil.
API gravity
A measure used by the petroleum industry to describe how light or heavy a crude oil is relative to water.
Sweet crude
Crude oil with relatively low sulphur content, generally making it easier and less costly to refine.
Brent
The leading international crude-oil benchmark associated with North Sea production.
WTI
West Texas Intermediate, the principal United States crude-oil benchmark.
Murban
An Abu Dhabi crude grade used as a benchmark with growing relevance for Asian markets.
Energy transition
The shift from a system dominated by fossil fuels towards a broader mix that includes lower-carbon and renewable sources.
Value addition

Conceptual references

  • OPEC’s formation, the 1973 oil embargo and the later creation of OPEC+.
  • Production quotas, baseline negotiations and competing national market strategies.
  • Saudi Vision 2030 financing requirements and the UAE’s lower-cost, higher-volume approach.
  • Saudi–Emirati competition, Gulf Cooperation Council dynamics and Russia’s role in OPEC+.
  • Asian oil demand, direct supply agreements and UAE investment in hydrogen, ammonia and renewable energy.
  • Brent, WTI and Murban as crude-oil pricing benchmarks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ANSAR-ALLAH-VS-SAUDI

BIN-SALMAN-IN-TROUBLE

NEW MIDDLE EAST RISING